The responsibility of the bystander has been a highly debated topic for
many years. There are those who feel it is the bystander’s civil duty to stand
up for what is right and prevent injustice; others believe that the bystander
should only worry about his/her personal happiness and avoid unnecessary
conflict. But this often becomes a gray area for matters such as the Holocaust
and Macbeth’s dictatorship because these issues make the bystander an actual
part of the injustice. The bystanders that comply to the demands often insist
that their refusal would have had no effect, that the wrongdoers would just
punish the bystander and find someone else to carry out the original order. But
I believe that this mentality is how genocides and tyrannies are allowed to
grow. A single bystander may feel they have no major influence, but what they
fail to realize is that there are other bystanders making the same decision.
And when all these bystanders choose the “easy way out” instead of standing up
to the evil, they allow the evil to spread.
Victor Capesius and Konrad Jarausch were right to assume that if they
refused their positions, someone else would have filled them. However, if every
German who felt uneasy about the Holocaust had refused their positions,
millions of Jewish lives might have been saved. What these two men, and
millions of men like them, failed to realize was their power over the Nazis. Dictators
and tyrants are nothing without people to manipulate and boss around, and Hitler
was no exception. He was able to succeed by controlling a small group of
dedicated followers and using them to overpower everyone else. He was nothing
more than a disturbed bully, but no one rose up to oppress him before it was
too late. Eventually most Germans either became like Jarausch, doing small acts
of kindness to ease their tortured conscious, or like Capesius, brainwashed by
Hitler’s teachings and left with no compassion.
Macbeth started out as a noble duke that was respected and revered for his
bravery, which was part of the reason people failed to realize the dictator he
had become. When a person idolizes someone, it is often very hard for that
person to break away from their perceptions about their idol and see the
reality of their actions. They refuse to believe that their hero has failed
them, and so they blindly continue to offer support. And even if they realize how their idol has
strayed, they often feel too indebted to the person to abandon or even question
them. They would rather remain under the safety of an evil power than stand up
for a fragile truth.
I am in no way claiming that Jarausch and Capesius should have valiantly
stormed up to Hilter and refused his orders to kill Jews, nor saying that I
would have had an easy time refusing these orders if I were in their shoes. And
while I believe that they do share the blame for the people they murdered, I
know that the true evil and malicious intent came from the Nazis. What I’m
getting at here is a problem that plagues all of humanity- the belief that one
person cannot make a difference, and therefore should do nothing or just give
in. We must somehow find a way to learn from our mistakes, and begin to combat
every injustice that we can. Eventually in Macbeth, surrounding nations and
people of power realized the evils of Macbeth and sought to end his reign.
Eventually in World War II, America and the Allied Forces realized the evils of
the Nazi and sought to end them. But in both cases, it took violent extremes
for people to step up and fight back. I hope that one day, people will learn to
always stand up against evil, even when that evil does not directly affect
them.
Hi Maddie,
ReplyDeleteNice response to the writing prompt. I enjoyed your insight into the snowballing nature of apathy--the belief that one person cannot make a difference compounds the difficulty of anyone doing anything. I also appreciated your discussion of people's unwillingness to see negative change in the character of those whom they worship, adore, or respect. Macbeth was worthy of respect before he altered, and his subjects wanted to believe that his newfound cruelty was an aberration and not due to some fundamental change. Good job.